Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circular redundancy

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ALREADY SPEEDIED, but not by me -Splash 02:34, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Circular redundancy

Non-encyclopedic PhilipO 19:51, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as nonsense. At least, it doesn't make any sense to me. An attempt at humor, maybe? --Several Times 20:22, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

• delete per above. I don't get it either. Hansonc 21:35, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

• speedy delete nm VfD, I've marked this and the other two articles created by the same new user at the same time for speedy deletion. I don't think meaningless rubbish should have to go through VfD. ~ Veledan | Talk | c. 22:30, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

NB The article was speedily deleted ~ Veledan | Talk | c. 13:44, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.