Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinepoetry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Walton^talk 16:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cinepoetry

Cinepoetry (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism. Original research. Long-term orphan. Main source is site of author. Term gets 91 unique ghits, filtering out that site and Wikipedia/mirrors. Drat (Talk) 07:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. WP:OR, WP:NOTE, no reliable sources, and possible COI (?). María (críticame) 12:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No reliable sources, and apparently a neologism. EdJohnston 04:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wiktionary. 5 google scholar hits and the name being connected with film festival awards[1][2] should be enough to attest its use for wikt purposes. John Vandenberg 05:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.