Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Chandler (Lost)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Chick Bowen 02:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cindy Chandler (Lost)
- Delete Minor supporting character on television series Lost. Information already supplied on Characters of Lost page. I don't believe her surname has ever been given as "Chandler" Danflave 18:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or merge. Ral315 (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. For reasons in nomination. -- PKtm 19:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, I'd say redirect, but as far as I can tell the surname isn't WP:V.--Isotope23 19:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as even the article title contains unverified information. Jtrost (T | C | #) 11:49, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete/Merge delete the article and merge the few very small bits of information that is known about her for sure . ArgentiumOutlaw 23:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
I think the entry should remain. There is a growing significance with her character and her relationship with Gary Troup. It would see that his nonfiction work and discussions about Hanso and Valenzetti will also have more significance. Also, her place in the lexicon of Lost hasn't fully been realized. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.23.34.232 (talk • contribs) 06:36, 5 May 2006
-
- I dont know about you, but right now it doesn't look like the series is going anywhere near this character (just an occasional reference to Troup's script). IF her involvment is growing, it won't be significant enough in this season anyway, and since it is about to end, I foresee 6 months of no mention of this woman. ArgentiumOutlaw 12:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.