Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cidershire

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Carried out at 19:50, 1 Jan 2005 by User:Francs2000

[edit] Cidershire

It seems there was a VfD consensus to delete this article. It still exists, and I don't think it was recreated. It looks like it simply wasn't deleted. --BM 16:47, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Should be speedied. Xezbeth 17:15, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
• It should be speedied in either case. Rje 19:20, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Speedied as vfd consensus to delete has already been reached once. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 19:52, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Previous VfD Discussion

Cidershire was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 6 votes to delete. Postdlf 06:18, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• All of 4 google hits to the same game-related website, nothing links there, and none of the pages it links to say anything about it. Fails to identify which fiction it belogs to. Suspect it is not notable. - Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 21:35, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Never heard of it. Delete. Deb 21:41, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Quaint idea, sadly made up. Delete -- Graham ☺ | Talk 21:45, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: I suspect this is "fiction" in the sense of "Rust belt" and "Bible belt" in the US are fictional names for areas. I.e. I think this is a neologism, rather than a fiction breakout. Geogre 00:31, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. --*drew 00:34, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Mmmkay. Non-notable (made up) and odd. Nadavspi 00:46, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.