Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciaran O' Connell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 16:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ciaran O' Connell
AfDs for this article:
Completely unreferenced bio of a student with an interest in politics. Non-notable. IrishGuy talk 22:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. He may well be active in his party, but he hasn't been elected to any public office. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete per very narrow scope of popularity Corpx 06:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete
subject is an election candidate, clear precedents exist of non-elected persons holding wiki pages - here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoin_%C3%93_Broin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Boyd_Barrett On that basis the page should not be deleted. The fact the subject is a "student" is irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Natexe (talk • contribs)
- Delete Not won any election for a position in public office, and I think that having read the two examples that have been given as a precident, at least one of them should be nominated for deletion also due to lack on notability. Irishjp 12:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, WP:BIO, WP:SOAP and WP:N. Please note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a poor reason for exclusion or inclusion. I have been an unsucessful candidate for local public office, and have been a Democratic Party official for a decade now, but I am not notable for those facts. Bearian 16:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Berian. GreenJoe 21:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per the nomination. I wish this person well, but the subject does not currently meet our WP:BIO standards. Yamaguchi先生 04:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.