Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ci-Xi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ... uhh ... well, some people want delete, some want redirect. So what I'll do is delete, then redirect. Golly, if King Solomon were alive today ... fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ci-Xi

The first paragraph says it's an unsigned band, no albums, no claim of mentions in media. Googling only gets results about Chinese people. - Bobet 16:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• delete fails band notability criteria. _└ ^UkPaolo/_TALK^┐ 17:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Mo0[talk] 07:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:MUSIC--MONGO 09:39, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Josh Parris#: 12:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Doesn't comply with WP:Music--Esprit15d 15:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- nn, vanity, spam, lack of references and/or Wikification, assaulting readers' eyes with excessive use of italics... B.Wind 18:34, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to the Chinese Empress of the same name...Gateman1997 21:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Empress Dowager Cixi (Ci Xi redirects there too). Thanks Gateman1997. - Bobet 02:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.