Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church virus protection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 03:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Church virus protection
provides advice to churches on the use of the internet. OR, wikipedia is not a How To guide. Tagishsimon (talk) 03:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Transwiki if an appropriate destination can be found, else Delete. Powers T 03:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a How To. Xdenizen (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed, the article is a How To. Red Act (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. This isn't specific to churches in any way, and it isn't even very good advice. (Disk-infecting boot sector viruses have been uncommon since the mid-90s, for instance.) The list of advice is a direct copy of this web site, also. Might be a highly convoluted attempt at promoting the sketchy-looking software advertised there. Zetawoof(ζ) 09:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, perhaps speedy delete given that much of the text is a copyright violation. I have removed and flagged that text as such. Without the text copied from the blog, we're left with a very brief article with no showing of context, minimal content, and no notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I was working under the assumption that the author of the blog was the person who contributed the text to Wikipedia, but I suppose we're better safe than sorry. =) Powers T 21:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- If that's the case, they can always pipe in and say so. Then again, I am unaware of any sectarian divisions in malicious software, so it's a bit hard for me to grasp how church virus protection would differ from more secular kinds. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I was working under the assumption that the author of the blog was the person who contributed the text to Wikipedia, but I suppose we're better safe than sorry. =) Powers T 21:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete - Wikipedia is not a How To Guide, and much of the text before the above noted action was possibly a copyvio. With that removed, we're not only left with unsourced generalizations, but a stub that does not assert notability. --Darkprincealain (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
