Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chungliang Al Huang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sr13 23:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chungliang Al Huang

Chungliang Al Huang (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not really shown. Unless notability is shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Notability fairly well verified by a google search, surely there are sources out there we can find. Charlie 00:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Request verification of his notability as an author. One example: "In the years since this timeless book was first published (1988), many other books have come along offering the "essentials" of Tai Ji. But none have equaled Huang's unique understanding of Eastern tradition, which has made him one of the foremost interpreters of Tai Ji and its philosophies." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canuckle (talk • contribs)
  • Keep I do martial arts, and my master has quoted this author in our classes... that combined with the above is enough notability for me.Balloonman 03:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Is your martial arts class notable? Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 05:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Only to the people at my school ;-) but my point is that this author is notable enough that my school that is unaffiliated with him has cited him. My Master had enough respect for him that he was quoted at my school.Balloonman 21:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Per Charlie --St.daniel Talk 12:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, per google search by Charlie. *Cremepuff222* 22:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as per consensus, add this to round it up. Stammer 17:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.