Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chung Tat-chi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was no consensus --cesarb 16:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Chung Tat-chi

The person is far from being significant to be included in wikipedia. Small potato 06:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete vanity. JamesBurns 08:04, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. — mark ✎ 10:50, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn, maybe if he won all those contests he would be notable, but as it is, no.--Etacar11 15:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Oh baby can you feel the KEEPING???--64.229.218.142 19:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • User has 8 edits, all to VfDs. Hermione1980 00:24, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep What, Chinese math stars are less notable than pokémon? SchmuckyTheCat 03:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. If we keep articles about every single proffesional sports player we should allow articles on the most talented of math stars. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Mathematics is different from sports. A person doesn't become a "star" in mathematics by winning IMO or Putnam, but to conduct great research, as in the cases of Terence Tao or Grigori Perelman. And in terms of legend, there are perfect scorers in IMO every year, those who've solved even the most challenging problem perfectly, and they are certainly much more legendary than this person. --Small potato 10:44, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as per Sjakkalle. — Instantnood 10:57, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Poor little thing, that seems to be the maiden work of a newbie. :'-( -- Jerry Crimson Mann 13:22, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
weak keep after all that guy is the first Hong Kong participant.
  • Delete I won several math olympiads too, so what?  Grue  18:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.