Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Thomas (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep. Tawker 05:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chuck Thomas (2)

delete - Many similar articles on non-notable people have been deleted in the past and there is no reason why this article should be kept on Wikipedia. Vandals have already removed this AfD tag before and it should stay on this article until the matter is resolved. Lughguy 22:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - well known producer and presenter. I deleted the AfD boilerplates because they were not added as AfD correctly. -- 9cds^(talk) 22:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - regional television producer, WP:NN. Also a sad lack of verifiable sources that are not fan/PR-based.--Marysunshine 22:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Producer for Quizmania, a national (once ITV1) show. -- 9cds^(talk) 23:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Same user added a mass number of these presenters. -- 9cds^(talk) 23:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - nationwide TV presenter and creator of a popular quiz show. SaltyWater 23:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - as per above. Another reason why notability is subjective, POV, and should not be used as a criteria for inclusion in or deletion from Wikipedia. DanielZimmerman 23:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Are all of these really good faith nominations? I don't believe they are. At best, I think we're well in WP:POINT territory; at worst, this smacks of vandalism. -- Captain Disdain 00:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.