Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Ruff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily kept after the article has been rewritten to be about the actual person. Any debate about whether he is encyclopaedic would go through a seperate AFD (and I don't think it will, though) Proto||type 14:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chuck Ruff

Delete. This page is about Edgar Winter, not Chuck Ruff. There is no need to move the article, however, because the page Edgar Winter is identical. --Danielrocks123 04:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Then a redirect would have solved the problem without involving AfD. Sandstein 04:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment This article is about a totally different person. A redirect would be inappropriate because someone searching for Chuck Ruff probably does not want a page about a different person. --Danielrocks123 05:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, article not about title. Could call it a test page and put a speedy delete CSD G2 on it.--blue520 05:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep new form.--blue520 11:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Then I'll suggest that. Speedy delete, fails G2. --Coredesat 07:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I've rewritten the article about the former counsel to Bill Clinton, Charles (Chuck) Ruff. Kevin 09:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • That's more like it. Keep. --Coredesat 10:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.