Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Karaolis (second nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. The Land 00:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christos Karaolis

the above comment are from User:194.60.38.10, I only listed this as second nomination. see [1] --Melaen 10:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable biography.  (aeropagitica)  17:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete in view of non-notability (not in view of the subject's desire that the article not appear). Joe 21:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep semi-notable figure in office of Deputy Prime Minister. Also vice-president of the UK arm of Nepomak, the World Organisation of Young Overseas Cypriots. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torim (talk • contribs)
  • Delete as non-notable. I've recently reduced the Whatlinkshere count (eg: [2] [3] [4]) -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Deletenot notable figure - also those trying to preserve the article seem to be doing it as a joke! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krad1 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep adviser to John Prescott on public policy. How is that not notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poolin (talk • contribs)
  • Comment to User:Poolin: First contribution to Wikipedia? Please don't delete votes. You are getting confused with John Prescott's notability zzuuzz (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 22:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as not notable and nobody here has offered anything above what's on the page. Turnstep 01:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete he's not an adviser to John Prescott on public policy - he is a researcher. There is a difference —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krad1 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete There are thousands of parliamentary researchers - not sufficiently notable in itself to warrant inclusion. NewmanSociety 01:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.