Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Rush

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Already has cleanup tag. I added some stub-sorts. -Splash 20:06, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher_Rush

not notable 128.112.24.137 04:18, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete Weak keep. Mr. Rush may actually be a relevant artist but without some more information the article serves no purpose. Collabi 06:43, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
    • I changed my vote, persuaded by the arugments below: even a nearly empty stub like ths can invite more information from readers. Collabi 11:43, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Anything relevant is already in the redirect from Black Lotus article. Eldereft 08:35, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep in addition to the artist, there's a reasonably famous author by that name. Don't remember the name of his book, though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:09, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable game artist, vfd is not cleanup. Kappa 16:52, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
  • For once I agree with Kappa: Keep and add the cleanup tag. If after a while no one has supplied any more information, I'll support a VfD at that point. Nandesuka 17:18, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
  • delete not enough content, can be recreated if necessary when someone has some info to put in article.--Tim Pope 19:46, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It would be interesting to see how this expands. Is it a practice to delete stubs on notable people? Hall Monitor 21:09, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
    • My concern is just that there isn't even enough information here to constitute a stub. With this little information it's just basically a page placeholding his name. Collabi 21:18, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep notable guy, but the article sucks.  Grue  19:31, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.