Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Quiray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There was unanimity that the subject fails to meet notability requirements. In addition, there are no reliable secondary sources. Finally, there is an overriding failure to meet WP:V, particularly with regard to the subject's amateur record. TerriersFan (talk) 22:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Quiray

The subject does not seem notable. I was not able to find any relevant secondary sources. Oore (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom. Nakon 21:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Individual fails WP:BIO per [1]. No second or third party coverage. This is also a failure of WP:ATHLETE. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 22:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. I found coverage in reliable sources (several issues of the Providence Journal), but not enough to establish notability, and nothing related to martial arts.
  • http://www.projo.com/northwest/content/projo_20031022_bbronco.4d5e.html
  • http://www.projo.com/northwest/content/projo_20040311_badd11.269990.html
  • http://www.projo.com/northwest/content/projo_20040707_bdig7.1acbe1.html --Eastmain (talk) 04:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.