Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Cottrill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Cottrill

Christopher Cottrill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Has not made an appearance in a fully professional league, so fails WP:BIO. robwingfield «T•C» 22:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Oh wow. Was in Brum's squadlist for two seasons but never appeared professionally. Created the article over three years ago when he was set to make appearances, but never actually did so. I guess this falls under a db-creator-request, not that such a thing exists, but feel free to delete speedily. Bobo. 00:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • This does not fall under "creator request", as you're not the sole contributor for this article. --Angelo (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I realized that at the time and thought it was unfortunate, even though, while he may have been able to achieve notability way back when I added the article, he failed to do so - thank you for clarifying, Angelo. Bobo. 11:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable lower-level footballer. Sebisthlm (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Maybe someone else will substantially improve the article. You never know. Take, for example, the thousands of villages in France the Blofeld of SPECTRE has created. Editors agreed to keep them, as I think they are unnecessary. At least this is about a real person, with some significance. ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 20:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - doesn't meet WP:BIO requirements ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. BanRay 11:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.