Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Bavaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Bavaria

Very obvious hoax, no such person ever existed -- Ferkelparade π 00:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• A Christopher Bavaria did exist, but I am unsure if the statue is the same person. Mike _{(T C)} 00:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: a person by that name may have existed, but definitely not the person the article is talking about. And the statue is certainly not the same person :P -- Ferkelparade π 00:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - too many clues that this is vandalism Richardcavell 00:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. ILovEPlankton 01:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Obvious hoax. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Metamagician3000 01:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. PJM 01:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, was the editor referring to Christopher of Bavaria? --Andy123(talk) 02:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• Doubtful, as he lived in the fifteenth century. --Saforrest 05:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 03:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Deville (Talk) 03:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Patman2648 06:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. SorryGuy 07:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 07:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.