Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christophe Richardson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Christophe Richardson

Delete. nn-bio. Google search showed the included links, but basically nothing else.-- Syrthiss 20:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. What harm could come from keeping this up? I put it up because I'm a big fan of CR's writing and I know he has a small fan base who will probably add to this article if it stays. c4richar 16:40, 8 December 2005 (EST)

  We have guidelines over at WP:BIO as to what qualifies a biographical article to be included on Wikipedia. If you can convince me and the other votes that he passes the bar, then it'll probably get a keep vote. Stifle 22:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

• Weak delete, fails WP:BIO, but not by much. Stifle 22:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - article itself doesn't address basic issues such as: 1) What is his first name? (it's mentioned only in the article title); 2) what's special about the website that it would be considered notable? (most people's websites are not notable at all); and 3) what is his claim to fame? The article seems to indicate that he is primarily notable for this yet-to-be notable web site. The article said that he "dabbled in photography"; so it is not asserting notability/claim to fame in that arena. Is there something significant missing here? B.Wind 00:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.