Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Robinson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Kusma (討論) 02:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christine Robinson

Completing the nomination by an anon. editor - User:69.143.30.51 Kevin 02:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete nonnotable bio per A7 and fails WP:BIO M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 02:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, what that person said. 7th place water polo team?! Someone appears to have made bios of a ridiculous number of Canadians who were at the 2004 Olympics. Olympian does not = notable.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.30.51 (talk • contribs)

  • Comment If you plan on nominating a lot of articles for deletion, PLEASE register and get an ID so you can complete the process. IP's cannot create deletion articles. Fan1967 03:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Fair Warning Same IP has nominated a bunch more. Guess he doesn't like Canadian athletes who didn't medal. He's now discovering he can't complete the AfD articles without registering first. Fan1967 04:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • There were no fewer than 26 tagged last time (the Baumann one). -- Jonel | Speak 04:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep I don't see anything wrong with this article besides being very short. People will expand it over time. Are you trying to challenge the notability of this (obviously) notable bio? Funnybunny (talk/Counter Vandalism Unit) 04:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep this and any other of Olympic bio articles this anon has tagged. Let's not encourage further time waste on this. --Rob 06:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, being recognised among the best of the best at anything is notable in my book. Rockpocket (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, article is indeed very short, but athletes who have participated in the Olympics are notable. JIP | Talk 08:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per precedent on Olympic athletes, since they all meet WP:BIO's standards for athletic achievement. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per ranking 7th in a world-wide compitition. ---J.S (t|c) 16:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep competition merits inclusion, but lack of medalling worries me ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 22:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Week keep, the lack of medalling also worries me. However, as other users have stated, all olympic athletes meet WP:BIO. Personally I would prefer to delete articles like these, but wikipedia consensus is against that. Falphin 23:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - if lack of medalling was a concern, then not being in the top three teams in the world would get a weak keep. At the moment the England football team hasn't come third in the world cup yet in recent times, so this might mean that David Beckham would be weak keep? on that reasoning alone. Being in the 7th best team in the world is certainly much higher than being a band member of some random band and getting a WP bio.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • According to Wikipedia, 11,099 people competed at the 2004 Olympics. The Olympics occur every two years, and while there is a lot of overlap (i.e. many people compete in two Olympics), even if we assume that half of all competitors will do so, that's still over 5000 new biographies every two years. Of course, what really happens is that the athletes from countries with better technology access have stub bios put up regardless of how well they did, and the athletes from other nations are ignored (Nigerian bronze medalist Christy Opara-Thompson has no bio despite her bronze medal; Jamaican multi-medalist Juliet Cuthbert, ditto). I recognize that I am not an established Wikipedia editor and therefore unlikely to change the minds of those who are, but the staggering number of cheap bios that would result from a genuine policy of "all Olympians are notable," or the nationalistic bias that is what really occurs, were what led me to nominate for deletion the three-sentence bios of Olympians who have never medalled nor competed professionally. However, if so many are passionately committed to the inclusion of every Olympian, perhaps they could put some work into those bios and also reduce the tendency of profiling only people from wealthier and English-speaking nations.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.30.51 (talk • contribs)
    Every single competitor (at least, those whose names were recorded) at the 1896 Summer Olympics has an article. See Category:Competitors at the 1896 Summer Olympics. Also take a browse through Category:Competitors at the 2004 Summer Olympics - I'm not even sure I can pronounce half the names of the people found there. There is a quite-active WikiProject dedicated to expanding coverage of the Olympics. While there are a lot of editors that add sportspersons they are familiar with first, and while it is a fact of life that this being the English Wikipedia sportspersons from English-speaking nations are usually the easiest to find information on, there are some of us who do work to make our coverage comprehensive. We will get there. I invite you to help out yourself—we could always use more helping hands. -- Jonel | Speak 04:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
    Comment: See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias. Scoo 16:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.