Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Murphy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christina Murphy

prod tag was removed by User:Badlydrawnjeff who wrote that "reality contestants are inherently notable". This contestant lost on the show, then went on to do nothing to set herself apart from her peers. About 600 hits on Google [1]. Mikeblas 04:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 04:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, reality show contestants are not inherently notable, any more than contestants on any other game show. Should we start articles on every contestant on Lingo? User:Zoe|(talk) 04:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Of course not. Lingo contestants don't stick in the public eye the way reality contestants do. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Failing on a reality TV show makes this person no more notable than any other individual who failed on any other game show. Resolute 04:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The only notable aspect of this article is the DisambigR pointer to the other Christina Murphy: Christina Booth. --Mareklug ^talk 05:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per Resolution, Zoe and Mareklug. JoshuaZ 06:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete/merge/redirect as with the other non-winners. How many more? ~ trialsanderrors 07:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 08:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 10:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Badlydrawnjeff has (unsuccessfully) used the same argument to contest prev. prod/AfD nominations. (See Bre Scullark, Sarah Dankleman, Kari Schmidt and Kathy Hoxit for prev. discussions on the matter. All resulted in a Delete consensus.) Caknuck 18:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • As noted elsewhere, consensus doesn't change overnight.
• Redirect to the show page. -- lucasbfr ^talk 21:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep. Known by millions, noted reality contestant, meets letter and spirit of WP:BIO. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Now's the right time to cull these stubs. Subject would fail the 20 year test with years to spare. Redirect to ANTM4 per plenty of precedent, or otherwise Delete. Ohconfucius 04:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.