Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christians in the Media
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 05:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Christians in the Media
Contested prod. Tagged for speedy deletion with rationale
- "A7 vague unverified and inadequate notability claim; IP editors have been removing maintenance / prod tags with no change to the article and no reasoning stated (probably COI-spam)"
Not a speedy candidate given the contested prod but I agree with the above. Pascal.Tesson 18:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's not about Willard Scott or Pat Robertson. It's a couple of sentences about an Australian company, called "Christians in the Media", that produces a TV show on an Australian cable channel, and the author apparently believes that the company is more worthy of an article than the TV show. Mandsford 20:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any support for notability.MarkinBoston 21:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with Sydney Anglicans or delete per the advice in WP:ORG: Local chapter articles should start as a section of the parent organization article. I added national radio and press coverage, but the subject doesn't yet justify an article of its own. Also, pace Mandsford it's a church, not a company. Seektruthfromfacts 17:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge I can't see enough independent sourcing to support an article on the church/ministry (it appears to be part both), but there is enough sourcing to support content in the article for the Anglican Diocese of Sydney (which is where Sydney Anglicans redirects). GRBerry 20:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete no content, no evidence of notability.--SefringleTalk 04:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.