Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity to the Extreme
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 03:01, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Christianity to the Extreme
article subject non-notable; article appears to have sole purpose of bringing attention to a local high school student's personal website/creation ERcheck 04:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. --70.32.238.234 07:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't have a hint of notability. -- Captain Disdain 08:11, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- This is vanity to the extreme. Delete. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m, +e ] 11:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Do not delete - I go to the maker of this "religion" high school and it is more than just one kid's creation. CTTE has a very strong following in our town even though many still consider it rediculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.177.66.6 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 1 November 2005
-
- Can I tell you a story? When I was in high school my friends and I decided to call going to the drinking fountain "a libation to Poseidon". We thought it was hilarious. When I was in college, I created the Church of the Pizza with Everything, dedicated to spreading the good news that the universe is, in fact, a pizza with Everything on it, including the pizza itself. I have no doubt that a lot of people where you're from are just tickled pink about their little in-joke, but it just doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. It should be deleted. --DavidConrad 07:10, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD A7. Nothing in the article establishes or alleges notability. - Sensor 02:05, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- A7 does not apply to organizations -- only people. -- Captain Disdain 02:37, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- Arguably the article is not about the fake church but was written as a hagiography about one Josh. That's why I suggested A7. If not speedy-eligible, then delete as NN vanity. - Sensor 03:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I see what you mean. I think that'd be a stretch, though. -- Captain Disdain 04:43, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- Arguably the article is not about the fake church but was written as a hagiography about one Josh. That's why I suggested A7. If not speedy-eligible, then delete as NN vanity. - Sensor 03:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- A7 does not apply to organizations -- only people. -- Captain Disdain 02:37, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. ERcheck 02:21, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Do Not DeleteThe article is about an organizaiton, not a person and therefore is not covered by A7
- Delete. Notability standards apply to all articles, not just people ones. An obscure organization confined to a single town is almost never noteworthy enough to merit an article. Wikipedia is meant to consistently represent all opinions and matters with an equal level of depth, not just the random issues that happen to be of interest to editors working on it, no matter how trivial. Otherwise our skewed focus on articles would be even worse than it currently is. -Silence 21:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
