Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian philosophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 03:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christian philosophy

Christian philosophy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Originally prodded, not contested, but given the subject and the size, I thought it'd be better to get a wider consensus input here. Procedural, so I'm abstaining AKRadecki 21:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete this may be uncited OR... but if somebody is willing to clean it up, then I think it would be better to slap a bunch of templates on it and give the author some time to do so. EG templates about standards/cleanup/OR/NPOV/etc. In otherwords, if somebody steps forward to work on this article, my vote automatically changes to "weak keep."Balloonman 21:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep The quality of the article isn't signifigant reason to remove it. Better to fix it. At least give time for someone to come forward to work on it. I might even be willing once I get through the massive list of articles on my queue. CJ 14:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - the term was really used for different philosophies. - I think that this AfD was not neccesary; as far as I know, it is up to the person who prodded the article to put it on AfD if the PROD template is removed. Moreover PRODs are not suitable for elaborated articles with dozens of contributors like this, they should be AfDed directly if somebody thinks they should be deleted, because it enables a wide discussion.--Ioannes Pragensis 16:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong keep Notable subject, will make for an interesting article if done correctly.--Gloriamarie 17:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Mainly needs sources and cleanup. Specifically: needs to define terms such as 'philosophy' and 'religion' to contextualize/introduce the article and needs to trace the origins of the phrase and usage of 'Christian Philosophy' and/or variants of this term. Deramisan 8:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong keep - but cleanup, as per above arguments. --JayJasper 19:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.