Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian newspapers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Christian media. Keeper | 76 18:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Christian newspapers
This seems to be no more than a dictionary definition of a newspaper (the article that was the source of much of the text here) that covers Christian topics or from a Christian POV. I don't see the encyclopedic value of keeping this as an article. -- Dougie WII (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Christian media WP:NOT... per nom. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Christian media makes a lot of sense. — brighterorange (talk) 03:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Christian media. Sting au Buzz Me... 03:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Merge into Christian media unless significant expansion is done. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 03:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Christian media. There is nothing to merge! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect for now to Christian media (which isn't in much better shape than this), without prejudice toward re-creation. The subject is probably notable enough for its own article, but the author has gone about this in a very odd way — essentialy taking a dictdef and adding "Christian" to it, along with a short list of examples. That won't work, and this article would likely be a speedy-delete candidate if a specific criterion applied to this category. (If this argument looks familiar, I also used it forWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian software.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: I just completed a major rewrite of Christian media, which I think will cover most of our issues. I'll put the Wikipedia Intensive Care Unit on this case to help with refs and such. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
