Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Whiton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Whiton

Christian Whiton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable subject. ghits: [1] NMChico24 00:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete 69 hits? I have nearly 5 times that. And I am in no way notable and I'm also ten years younger. Oh, and I also worked for a US Senator once. Not even for his special envoy to Korea; for him. I'm still not notable. So neither is he. --CastAStone|^(talk) 00:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO -- Selmo ^(talk) 00:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability. No sources. No verifiability. --Shirahadasha 00:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Until there is WP: BUREAUCRAT this is completely nn. Mystache 01:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Notability is not asserted beyond a weak government connection. The subject himself has never been the focus of any non-trivial written publication. Leebo⁸⁶ 02:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of notability, fails Bio. Daniel5127 <Talk> 03:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for notability. Philippe Beaudette 05:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 08:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails notability--Boookabooo 10:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete lacks sources to pass WP:BIO.-- danntm ^T _C 14:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Unfortunately fails both the letter and the spirit of WP:BIO and does not seem to be as notable as most editors would include it. אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) • Give Back Our Membership! 14:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N and WP:BIO. JCO312 15:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Definitely a one to keep and does have notability.Tellyaddict 16:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment The article doesn't really assert that he passes the notability guidelines for people. Do you have a link to any sources that assert this? Leebo⁸⁶ 16:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

• weak delete I could see where people like this could be potentially notable. nonetheless, fails WP:BIO. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete: Almost notable... .V. _[Talk|Email] 23:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete-Fails WP:BIO. --TeckWiz^Talk Contribs_@ 00:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per all of the above. Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 08:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems to have enough notability. More than a great number of entries —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.201.136.57 (talk • contribs).— 69.201.136.57 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.