Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Rausch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Rausch

Christian Rausch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not meet WP:BIO. No sources. No links. What makes this scientist notable? Nothing. Delete Undeath (talk) 13:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete per A7. He's a scientist. He works at a lab. That's it? DarkAudit (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. It takes major accomplishments for a Ph.D. student to be sufficiently notable for an article, and I don't see that here. It's a little difficult to distinguish his publications from the other "C. Rausch"s appearing in Google scholar, but I don't see anything special e.g. in this search. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable Xxanthippe (talk) 09:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC).
  • Delete for what its worth, the lab group's page [1] indicates he just got his degree. Not that the total of 4 genuine publications (name+university in Web of Science) make him notable at this point. DGG (talk) 02:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. No notability asserted, meets speedy delete criteria. GregorB (talk) 23:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. A 2007 PhD would have to have done something special to merit an article and there's no evidence of this here. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Seems like self-promotion. — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 02:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.