Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissie Carnell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chrissie Carnell

Chrissie Carnell (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete - nn model/actress, only a few bit parts. Many references are dead links, no mention at Fashion Model Directory. After Midnight 0001 01:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete not notable SefringleTalk 01:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Watchingthevitalsigns 02:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep this article is not really any different from any other model stub. Significant contributions to Vogue magazine and other notable publications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ffm 12:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • comment please elaborate After Midnight, why this stub is any different from many listed on wiki...check out this joke: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Anderson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I ask closing administration to check out other model stubs and this one is pretty standard, quality wise to the rest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.110.247.117 (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment A heads-up: please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tweety21. Precious Roy 17:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
  • comments by Precious roy are Libelous!!!! will contact admin!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:BIO. The majority of references are from user-edited sites like TV.com and are unreliable. Precious Roy 12:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.