Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Calhoun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-14 11:27Z

[edit] Chris Calhoun

Chris Calhoun (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A Korean War vet. Three sources, two on free web hosts and one to amazon.com which doesn't even include the page it's on, just the root. Maybe decent sources can be found, but this does not have any. Guy (Help!) 19:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• Very Weak Delete - based on the statements in the article this person has a perfectly good claim to notability, but unfortunately the current references aren't sufficient as evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources per WP:BIO. I would prefer to keep this article; however, delete unless sources can be found by the end of this AfD. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 20:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete, I fail to see non-trivial secondary sources conforming WP:BIO. If adequate sources are found change to keep Alf^Photoman 21:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The article quoted in that first link is in lexis-nexis. I'll add the newspaper article to the page. Bucketsofg 00:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• 'weak keep It might depend on how widely the matter was reported--nationally or just locally.DGG 04:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep marginally notable person, with article barely sourced but enough information to believe that it could be well-sourced in the future. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 00:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.