Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chortle Wind

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE BOTH. -Splash^talk 23:38, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Chortle Wind and Xascdv

nn bv - and a rather bizzare duplicate (strangley titled - and using some form of templet), both created today. --Doc (?) 19:31, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• delete. Articel says it is "little known" and a "garage-type" band. I'll take it at it's word. DES ^(talk) 21:54, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• comment Chortle Wind has very low googles (11, only 4 distinct). On the other hand it was around for 7 years and had an impressive number of albums...if those are full albums. RJFJR 23:24, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
• delete. Of the google hits, only those from http://invisionfree.com/ seem to refer to them as a band, and that could be just a joke. The main result is [1] a poll set up "In response to Bagrec's challenge to create the most obscure/least-voted-in poll ever...". I think we're behond non-notable, fan-cruft, and entering the realm of un-verifyable.Silverfish 13:21, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like a crappy article too. Looks like the writer of it didnt know how to make wikipedia articles. And 11 google hits isnt very notable. BL Lacertae 00:54, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete both. It's nonsense that's leaked out of The Fall's forum. Flowerparty■ 02:04, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.