Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate balls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 23:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chocolate balls

Used to be a specific recipe, which was moved to Wikibooks Cookbook, so now it's just: "Chocolate balls are a snack made of chocolate and peanut butter" and a picture. Googling for "chocolate balls" gives me plenty of hits, of course, but to a myriad of different recipes and concepts of what makes a "chocolate ball". I think this concept is too diffuse to merit an article. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 19:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC) Update: I think the keep responses below are well-reasoned. I now vote keep. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom Tom Harrison ^(talk) 19:47, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Colin99 20:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It's verifiable and it's common. One day some gastronomically-inclined user will expand it. Ifnord 20:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete before some deranged South Park fan tries to expand this article into something we'll have to delete or merge later. B.Wind 22:31, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Fear not, they already have their page. :-) —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 22:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Leave it to the UK to make it a #1 chart hit. B.Wind 06:42, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Never get between a woman and her chocolate balls. Endomion 22:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - The only reasonable argument for deletion seems to be the variation in recipes. If these are considered and expanded on the article will show no bias. Palaeologus 06:46, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, popular food item, potential to expand to discuss various recipes and the South Park thing. Kappa 05:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I have made some minor improvements in the page in response to these comments. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.