Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choc Shit Lovers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C) at 04:39 UTC (2006-05-25)

[edit] Choc Shit Lovers

This was proposed for deletion, and I contest deletion. This is a real series of porn films. It may not be to everyone's liking, but that's no reason to delete it. I like Vike 03:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete No notability whatsoever. Googling the term brings up only 5 total hits, and 3 of those are MySpace. People on Google user groups do not count as "reliable" independent reviewers. Just because the films are real does not mean they inherently deserve a place on Wikipedia (see also: some indie films, almost all student films, many porn films). As far as your comment on the article's talk page, Vike (and this is not to be argumentative, only to present another opinion), you're absolutely correct: "Notability is subjective and it isn't an official deletion policy." With that said, it's obvious that these films are not notable. In addition, while there is no official deletion policy for notability, lacking it is grounds for deletion. Otherwise, I could create an article with the content "I have ten fingers," and then argue that it should stay on WP because it's true. I respect the effort you put into your articles (and for bringing the pages to AfD as opposed to just taking down a deletion tag, which the vast majority of editors would), but I don't feel this one needs to exist. -- Kicking222 03:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Might be a hoax, but even if 100% true wouldn't be notable enough for an encyclopedia. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. --Terence Ong 04:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kicking222's excellent argument. Reyk _YO! 05:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Thetruthbelow^(talk) 05:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kicking222. Kudos for bringing it here though. Rockpocket (talk) 08:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn.--Jusjih 14:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Move to Scat pornography to start this article. Erm, yuc. Tyrenius 15:31, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN --Alphachimp ^talk 19:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, if we had an article for every shitty porno movie... (geddit? GEDDIT?) Lankiveil 23:31, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.