Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chobe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chobe

Chobe (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Taken from UrbanDictionary - it said so in the link at the bottom of the page. See also, WP:NEO. My attempt at speedy deleting was apparently refused(?) Stephenb (Talk) 21:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Yes, it was. –Deletion sensei

Thanks - though no reason was given in the edit summary for doing so :) Stephenb (Talk) 21:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• It appears my prod was also debated, the reason given: "Deleted warning: not necessary given nature of article and slang word it references". If they are contesting the article's deletion, then perhaps a merger, or just giving "Chobe" a mention in the Newbie article? Either way, Delete this one in question. ^Dlae│_here 21:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and while it's well beyond a dicdef, there are no reliable sources for this provided - appears to be a non-notable neologism with an original research piece written on it. Urban Dictionary as a source for Wikipedia articles? You've gotta be kidding me.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 22:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:NEO and WP:DICT, specifically, and I quote from the first line: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a slang, jargon, or usage guide. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NEO handles this. Malinaccier (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above; WP:NEO takes care of it. Master of Puppets ^{Call me MoP!} 00:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable niche neologism. Alliteration ftw ^_^ JuJube (talk) 00:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - This is a re-post which I have previously speedied myself. Deb (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.