Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitika

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. WaltonAssistance! 18:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chitika

Chitika (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested PROD, speedy deletion speedily overturned at DRV. The original reasons for deletion were that the article reads like an advertisement, and that there are conflict of interest problems with the article. A speedy tag placed on the recreated article also brought up notability concerns. This is a procedural nomination, so no opinion. Coredesat 22:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

  • weak keep sources do seem to exist [1], [2]. But it's not much... --W.marsh 22:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom. Stoic atarian 06:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Lengthy articles in AdWeek and the New York Times, along with the shorter Washington Post item mentioned above, are sufficient for me. Not sure how the above user can do a "delete per nom" when the nominator says "no opinion". Needs some cleanup, so I've added it to my watchlist and will spend some time on it in the future. JavaTenor 08:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Needs revision for tone, but otherwise not outrageously spammy in its present form. DGG 04:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 13:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep ONLY IF the article is totally rewritten by the end of this debate. As it stands it reads like corporate fluff and is a failure of many guidelines. Nuttah68 15:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.