Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chippy Charles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chippy Charles

Chippy Charles (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

For starters, no such character exists for this television show. Secondly, even if such a character existed, precedence precludes individual characters of this show from having their own articles. Thirdly, the article states "He can only appears in some backgrounds and cheers for other non-backgrounded characters.", which sounds like a clear case of non-notable for both in- and out-of-universe context. Finally, to add to my first point, I suspect this is just a hoax. Yngvarr 12:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

• DeleteHOAX Mr_pand 13:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Likely hoax. In any case vacuous entry. Decoratrix 19:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete minor character in dumb show, even if not a hoax. (P.S. I call Danny Daniel) JuJube 02:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete- garbage, hoax. Best just someone close this AFD now. The sunder king 17:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

hoax is not a valid reason for speedy.DGG (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Another admin told me to put that tag on the page. Just close this AFD. The sunder king 18:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I did, but I also said it did not meet CSD. Clearly Wikipedia is exceeding my expectations today. Prodego ^talk 22:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

As JuJube points out, there's a very good chance that this is Danny Daniel, a well-known hoaxter. I'm getting tired of tagging his sock pages, because his history shows that he's made up several socks per day, and it's just not worth tracking this guy. But I'll AFD tag hoax arts created. If an admin wants to review the history, see my archived case at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Danny Daniel, but I'd like to recommend speedy; regardless of hoax status, WP:CSD#G5 applies. Yngvarr 21:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.