Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chindia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep rewritten article. - Mailer Diablo 01:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Chindia

dictionary definition. -- SoothingR^(pour) 15:24, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete neolog Ashibaka (tock) 17:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC) Now that it's been expanded, no vote-- I'm not one to know whether this is widely used or can be more than a dicdef. Ashibaka (tock) 05:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This term is actually in use as Sino-Indian relations become more friendly and their economies grow. Punkmorten 18:46, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The issue is not use; the article does not provide information that qualifies it as an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Deltabeignet 19:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC) Keep; no longer a dicdef. Deltabeignet 21:39, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wikictionary; seems to be a somehow widespread neologism. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 20:41, 6 November 2005 (UTC) No more a dictionary definition now. The content is worth an article -- not completely sure the title Chindia is appropriate, but it can be moved later if necessary. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 09:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - "the article does not provide information that qualifies it as an encyclopedia article". It may not at the moment, but has the potential to. It is a common terminology in economics and general finance. Deano 20:46, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef of a particularly ghastly neologism. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 21:43, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - I've just expanded the article to talk of the context as to why "Chindia" has become important. Categories need to be added yet. While Sino-Indian relations looks at the entire gamut of relations from a historical perspective, this article (in the expanded form) primarily looks at the scope and progress in economic synergies between the country. The popularity of the term "Chindia" is another reason for my "keep" vote.--Gurubrahma 01:44, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - The revised article is more than a dictionary definition and qualifies as an encyclopedia article, in my opinion. Walter Siegmund (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for the new version. Tintin 19:43, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep--Pamri ^{• Talk • Reply} 14:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep – interestingly enough there was a "chindia" map on commons: a few months back. =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to Sino-Indian relations as neologism, but somewhat in use.
  -- Миборовский ^U|T|C|E 23:48, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.