Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief medical officer (Star Trek)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge pending someone finding somewhere appropriate to merge it to. It will be a standalone article until then. W.marsh 15:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chief medical officer (Star Trek)

Chief medical officer (Star Trek) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

While characters who hold this position may be notable, the job itself is not. EEMeltonIV 17:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Chief operations officer (Star Trek) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Keep or Merge - a whole article, well-referenced (which sadly this one isn't), could be written about each of these officer positions in the Trek franchise and now their roles have changed over the years. I'd actually be surprized if there isn't already an article about this under another name. Shaundakulbara 18:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• Mergeor Delete This stub has been around 3 and a half years and still has no references other than original research based on the TV series. Does not satisfy WP:FICT ,WP:N, WP:OR or WP:RS. Edison 19:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as fancruft. MastCell 20:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Delete, this can easily be merged into one of the character Star Trek articles, and as listed above, has no sources for a significant length of time. No reason for an article to be devoted to this which it can be incorporated into something else. --Nehrams2020 21:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge - but into which article...? Starfleet perhaps? --Rebroad 01:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - The COO position is more than notable. Though there is no reason to delete an article or merge it into something like CMO (totally unrelated). I'm not saying though, that it doesn't need improvement. Deepdesertfreman

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.