Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken and Duck Talk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chicken and Duck Talk

Chicken and Duck Talk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete another unsourced article about a film with no indication as to notability. Carlossuarez46 19:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Keep no claim of adequate notability (film awards nomination). JJL 19:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Nominated for but did not win an award. Not notable. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
    Comment still see no indication of meeting notability in the article. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 19:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This should have been speedy deletion. Muntuwandi 23:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. For the record, direcor and actor Michael Hui has already a Wikipedia article, and this movie is referenced in that article. Also the Hong Kong Film Awards are described as "the most prestigious film awards in Hong Kong and among the most respected in East Asia.", according to Wikipedia. Obtaining two nominations for this award might indicate notability at least in Asia. The director (Michael Hui) is certainly notable, as one of his other films is listed among the "Best 100 Chinese Motion Pictures". Oceanh 02:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC).
    • Expansion: I tried to expand the stub a little bit. Noted that four other articles already 'links' to this article, so it's no orphan. Will not cast any "votes" though, but leave that to the experts on Asian film. Oceanh 04:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete non-notable. Doctorfluffy 22:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Expansion thats my vote--Zingostar 17:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.