Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Fried Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chicken Fried Radio

Chicken Fried Radio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable podcast. Aside from some reviews in non-notable sources, there's only trivial media coverage. --Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 12:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep These new web 2.0 media channels are brand new, and unknown at this time of their lasting impact and its important we keep a history of them. scope_creep 14:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. The only thing that looks even remotely like a reliable source (azcentral) is actually just a single mention in a long article about podcasts and thus trivial. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, for the exact reasons that Scope creep explained: it's brand new and unknown at this time. Any speculation to lasting impact is crystalballery, and we are not a mechanism to record history of things not notable. For instance, we don't care (beyond trivial interest) what Napoleon Bonaparte had for breakfast on the day that the Louisiana Purchase was completed. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Although it looks interesting, it fails WP:N and WP:WEB. Jauerback 18:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Doctorfluffy 22:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx ^T/_C 22:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I wrote part of it back when the podcast was producing weekly episodes and gaining new listenership. At that point, it was at least on the road to notability, but now the listenership has dropped off dramatically. If it ever becomes popular again, it can be rewritten then. For now, delete. Dairhenien 02:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.