Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Attack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 13:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chicken Attack

Chicken Attack (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable game. Article is unsourced and I was unable to locate any reliable secondary sources. Prod was contested with message "lots and lots of g-hits for game." Chunky Rice 19:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Lots of G-hits for the game, yes. And other games that seem to have the same name. WP:WEB requires multiple, non-trivial references, at a minimum, but there's nothing in the article now, and I doubt this would make the other guidelines either. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 19:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep I removed the original prod because of the number of g-hits (110,000). While I'm aware that sheer number of g-hits don't make a subject meet WP:NOTABILITY, I find it hard to believe that in there aren't any non-trivial sources in any of those g-hits. (Not to mention magazines, etc.) Yes, the article needs a complete rewrite and sources, but I don't believe it's a hopeless case.--Kathy A. 21:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
There are really only about 500 hits on google [1]. And not all those are even about this game. Those that are are mostly sites hosting the game itself or forum posts. I did look through several pages of google hits and found no reliable sources.Chunky Rice 21:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Yep - I get that many Google hits, and I'm hardly what one would call notable. And quotes around a phrase are important when counting hits! DewiMorgan 20:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.