Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 10:09Z

[edit] Chicco

Chicco (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

company has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial verifiable published works independent of the company and does not meet notability guidelines. Warfieldian 22:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep, very notable company, as evidenced by multiple, relaible, nontrivial sources, including a mention in NYT. —siroχo 02:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above. If you have kids, you'll certainly have heard of Chicco, which are one of the biggest brands in the segment. Admittedly, the article could be a lot better, but notability is well enough asserted, and what's more, it's true that their products are available (and popular) the world over. Ohconfucius 07:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per nom.Cyberdemon007 16:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.