Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicagraphy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 03:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chicagraphy
This term was coined on some guy's blog, and is not in general use. I'd bet it is not in use anywhere except on that blog. Doubtless the guy likes to toot his own horn. Speciate 06:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sounds like a made up term, couldn't find anything about it other than that guys blog.Gorkymalorki 06:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Guy has adroitly placed term into many blogs, on myspace, etc. Still not notable. Speciate 06:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It's a legitimate art group/exhibition and there's a joint website, but I don't think it passes WP:N. Google News Archive shows nothing, for example. But the website would probably be notable before the term would. --Dhartung | Talk 09:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Guy has adroitly placed term into many blogs, on myspace, etc. Still not notable. Speciate 06:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEO Rackabello 07:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom Harlowraman 07:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as NN WP:NEO. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minneagraphers, and be on the lookout for other similar portmanteaux.--Dhartung | Talk 09:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
