Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chessie Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 08:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chessie Moore

Nn sex worker, no reliable sources, advertising VivianDarkbloom 19:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. No real claim of notability Non-notable sex worker who made relatively few non-notable pornographic videos to publicize her own line of "custom" videos. Article is almost entirely sourced from her website selling those videos and therefore doesn't meet WP:RS. Only real claim to fame is her self-reported willingness to have sex with dogs (actual canines) in front of a camera. That's not encyclopedic. VivianDarkbloom 19:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Extremely well-known player in the porn business. -- Necrothesp 03:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Well known porn actress, appeared as cover model for major pornographic magazines. Wildthing61476 04:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Necrotheep and Wildthing, but for such a long time in the biz (1980s) she comes up short on WP:PORN BIO. Suggest finding more sources. --Dhartung | Talk 05:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment No vote quite yet from me, but some early thoughts... I decided to take a hard look at the videos which Chessie's been in. IAFD says she's been in 215 movies which is substantial and well above the "100 films" test in WP:PORN BIO (and yes I realize the test is dubious). Pulling out all the films which were tagged by IAFD as compliations, as well as all the films where the distributor is tagged as "CMoore" (to remove VivianDarkbloom's "custom" movies) left me with 125 films ranging from 1989 to 1996. That's still a substantial number of films. Tabercil 14:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. She's notable, partly for many films, partly in a niche genre (unnaturally large enhancements), and partly for, well, bestiality by an otherwise reasonably well known porn star. That really is quite rare, usually considered demeaning, often considered outright illegal, and would have been stricken from the article except she references it on her own web site (and Luke Ford writes about it in his article, but that wouldn't have been sufficient for us to write about it without confirmation on her own site). For those who like Wikipedia: Notability (pornographic actors), that's the "unique, noteworthy contribution" bit. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per above. wikipediatrix 20:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tabercil; with that many movies, we should be able to address Vivian's well-placed sourcing concerns. Mangojuice^talk 21:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per AnonEMouse ♠PMC♠ 19:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per all above — quite notable ➥the Epopt 22:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.