Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chesapeake Science Point

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge/Redirect with district. JERRY talk contribs 02:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chesapeake Science Point

Chesapeake Science Point (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

sub high school level schools are not considered notable unless there is a specific event or qualifier that gives them a claim to such notability Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 20:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete it makes the WP:CRYSTAL claim that it will become a high school in the future, but even after that, I don't subscribe to the idea that high schools are inherently notable. Notability not established. Not that this is a valid benchmark, but I live 10 minutes away, and I've not heard of it. -Verdatum (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 00:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge to school district/redirect as becoming the norm. Possible keep if sources are found. TerriersFan (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect to district. CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge to school district/redirect per TerriersFan. Noroton (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment The nominator's rationale is without any foundation in policy or consensus practice. Noroton (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Actually WP:OUTCOMES discusses this. The established precedent in hundreds of cases was that High Schools were generally able to claim notability by default and middle-schools and below are not. Please think next time before you step out and make false statements about consensus and practice.--Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 13:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.