Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherohonkee

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 07:00, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cherohonkee

Almost nonsense. Seems to make some sense, but also seems completely unreal. smoddy 21:58, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I think this is a hoax. Gwk 22:00, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• This is real. I know these people. A real term. 69.203.207.56 (talk • contribs)
  • I suggest you read WP:NOT. Gwk 22:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• I can believe the phrase exists; 579 Google hits, and seems analogous to such slurs as Oreo, banana and wigger. However, virtually all of the hits seem to refer to a book by Robert Lanham, so, since it doesn't seem to have especially caught on beyond that book, merge to Robert Lanham. Dcarrano 00:59, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. JamesBurns 06:44, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 07:56, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I don't have the book to hand, but from what I can remember of the relevant page, this is almost certainly a copyvio from Lanham's book. - Mustafaa 17:59, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- bordering on copyvio, and a neologism to boot. I like Robert Lanham's books as much as the next guy, but seriously. Haikupoet 04:27, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Robert Lanham. I suggest that Food Court Druid also redirect to him, once it has been deleted as the copyvio it currently is. —Stormie 09:03, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.