Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheese (recreational drug)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus on merging, but if someone wants to do it, it's again an editorial decision. - Bobet 09:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cheese (recreational drug)

Pointless Article, do we need individual articles that name heroin with each individual cutting agent? Aspensti 14:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep - I can find several .gov sources for this as well as many news articles. While I don't think every form of heroin needs an article, this one appears to have become newsworthy in recent months. The article could, perhaps, be merged with heroin, but I think it's big enough to stand on its own. Also, a note to the nominator: please don't call articles stupid. It's considered poor form and could cause others to call your nominations bad faith in the future. Srose (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Next time I want your opinion on my manners, Ill ask you. Aspensti 15:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• WP:CIVIL, please follow policy. Thanks. hateless 16:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Aspensti, I was merely trying to let you know that some AfDs have fallen through as a result of things like that. I meant no offense; I only meant to help. Srose (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Its cool :-) Aspensti 00:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep/merge. I think we might be better off merging it, since it's recent and we don't know about its continuing notability. But as it has a name and apparently a specific market, it is a separate thing and not just heroin with Tylenol PM as a cutting agent (usually a cutting agent is just to dilute the drug and is unknown to the buyer, anyway). --Galaxiaad 16:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep/merge per Galaxiaad, although press coverage may have made the subject notable enough for its own article. hateless 16:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as per Galaxiaad. Notable, but not enough to have its own article.

Once again, I forget to sign my comment. Above is me Supersheep 22:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - The heroin article itself is very long - I think this is too long to merge. WhisperToMe 23:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.