Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Boyett-Compo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, so keep. -Splashtalk 19:23, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Charlotte Boyett-Compo

  • Delete. This is a vanity page. aliceinlampyland 20:03, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup. She's published more than a handful of books. Al 20:14, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps, but are they really notable? Anywho, the page was created by this individual and that's a no-no. aliceinlampyland 10:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Author of over 30 books, the Windlegends series is nine volumes by itself. The article itself looks ok from a NPOV standpoint, though the userpage is a copyvio. I'm going to be watching this...it is worrysome when someone writes about themselves. Rx StrangeLove 18:21, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, as this does seem to meet the criteria of a vanity page. Also, this seems to be one of several recent drive-by edits by the same User on the same day. The Bearded One 06:30, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I think the subject belongs, would it help if I rewrote it? I'm perfectly happy to if that would ease your concerns. Rx StrangeLove 17:36, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
I just checked the User Contributions page for User:Windlegends [1]. It appears that this individual made about 40 edits in a two-day period (31 Aug - 02 Sept and nothing since then), all of which seem to be hawking for Charlotte B-C and her novels. Nearly all of the edits have been removed as spam by other Wikipedians who watch over their respective articles. We should probably do likewise. The Bearded One 03:44, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as vanity.---CH (talk) 02:12, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Google gives 15,600 hits. Notable enough for me. Paul August ☎ 23:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.