Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Whitlock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Charles Whitlock

The person might be the subject of a notable court case, but I can't find any evidence that that's the case. Search isn't helped by the article not mentioning which company is being sued.--Aim Here 03:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. It sounds more like a local news kind of case than an Enron. Unless the SCOTUS sets some sort of landmark precedent from this case, which I doubt will happen, it's not encyclopedic. --Kinu 03:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 03:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Feel Sorry For The Guy But Delete ppoi307
• Delete unless someone can demonstrate that this case is groundbreaking --djrobgordon 07:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Sad case but doesn't appear to be notable. WP:NOT a memorial to the dead.  (aeropagitica)  09:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. While sad, there is no evidence in this article (or elsewhere on the internet, that I could find) to suggest that this figure, or his incidental death, are notable. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Very tragic but as of the current time it has to be a delete per above. --kingboyk 01:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.