Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Chips

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Nakon 17:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Charles Chips

Charles Chips (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails both WP:NOTABILITY and WP:CORP. Delete Undeath (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete non-notable company that fails WP:CORP. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep The article doesn't do justice to the subject, a company that has existed for decades and operates over a wide area. Some will find it difficult to believe that there were people who would get home delivery of potato chips and other snack foods that could be purchased in a supermarket, but it's true. Since this won't be a snowball, I'll look for sources. Mandsford (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Plenty of sources at Google news. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment "Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by sources that are reliable and independent of the organization. In other words, they satisfy the primary criterion above."Undeath (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. That's exactly what those Google News hits confirm. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Surely this is a WP:HEY candidate, but with minimal effort I can see that this brand has been covered by the New York Times, amongst other reliable publications. (jarbarf) (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.