Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaptercheats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. Vanity, nn club. Madchester 15:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chaptercheats

Least notable forum ever. ~~ N (t/c) 00:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Not true, we've had articles about forums with 50 members. But delete. Ashibaka tock 00:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Well myself and the other moderators have been contributing to this.

    I mean, it has 6,000 members now, how can you say that it is least notable, and also you want to delete its wiki? 6,000 members with no advertising, I think the forum is doing quite fine with that kind of back-up.
    —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KevinCheung (talk • contribs) .
  • Delete I once had a forum with a whopping 13 members. howcheng {chat} 01:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not only is this an awful article, it's a non-notable webpage. Tokakeke 01:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • comment As much as I hate to say it, they are a forum with over 5000 members. That being said, it sppears that WP:WEB no longer uses that as a basis for notability, which is why I have no vote for now. (Except to say that if kept, the article is not very encclopedic and needs some work). --Bachrach44 02:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable web forum. 6,000 members but only 22,353 total posts -- less than 4 each. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-17 02:18Z
  • Delete as non-notable.--ragesoss 04:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as non-notable vanity club. This page explains the rules of the forum. It belongs on the forum, not Wikipedia. SycthosTalk 04:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Even if this forum was notable, you couldn't tell it from the completely pointless article. Hint to ANYONE wanting to write an article on a forum: WE DO NOT CARE WHAT YOUR USER LEVELS ARE. WE DO NOT CARE WHO YOUR MODERATORS ARE. WE DO NOT CARE WHAT YOUR RULES ARE. WE DO NOT CARE WHO BANNINATED WHOM FOR POSTING TUBGIRL WHEN. We care about *what you talk about on your forum* and *why people should care that you talk about it.* Thank you and have a nice day. FCYTravis 06:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Ok..try looking at every other forum wiki you jackass and you will soon find a recurring pattern. Moderators are part of a forum, so it would be useful if they were included. It is obvious that you wikipedians are a bunch of uptight fools, just looking for ways to damn other pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.102.90 (talk • contribs)
    Lots of articles on forums here suck, and I've been on a mission to clean them up. FCYTravis 07:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Best nomination ever. OhnoitsJamie 07:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • 22,543 posts is due to mass-pruning of posts which is carried out periodically, every 3 -6 months.
  • Speedy Delete as per Sycthos. Vanity ad spam pure and simple. And I somehow doubt that KevinCheung is an admin with only 13 edits! —gorgan_almighty 14:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per FCYTravis. --Terence Ong 14:44, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.