Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapel Hills Mall (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chapel Hills Mall

Chapel Hills Mall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Another mall without notability. Result of previous AfD was speedy delete. Vegaswikian 06:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Good stub on a major metropolitan mall. This deletion nomination is bogus. Rebecca 06:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Bogus? Kindly assume good faith. Vegaswikian 07:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Am I reading the history correctly? Did you remove the AfD tag from the article after a vote to delete? Vegaswikian 07:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Uh, what the hell? I haven't touched the article since removing the bogus speedy tag. Rebecca 07:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete seems like your average mall - ie, nothing that makes it stand out and there's no "significant coverage" mentioned of this mall. Just listing a group of buildings for just being buildings would seem like a violation of WP:NOT#DIR Corpx 17:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:RS. I found one article on the closure of the mall's ice rink but that's about it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 20:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep This is a super-regional mall, with approx 1.2 million square feet of gross leasable area. Shopping malls says "A super-regional mall is a shopping mall with over 800,000 square feet (74,000 m²) of gross leasable area, and which serves as the dominant shopping venue for the region in which it located." Malls of this size have been kept in recent AFDs, per a list of AFD results kept at the talk page of the rejected guideline WP:MALL. Edison 20:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Just because other super-regional malls have been kept isn't a very solid reason. I agree that it's a very sizeable mall, and it has a ton of anchor stores, but I really don't think size is enough for notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 22:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep per Edison.--JForget 23:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep size isn't everything, but it counts. I'm not sure what the border is, but this is above it. DGG (talk) 01:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - super-regional malls this massive would be a notable local landmark. In any event, there does seem to be some news coverage of this such as [1]. -- Whpq 21:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Edison. Major super-regional mall. --Oakshade 22:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep of course a super-regional mall is going to be notable. Burntsauce 17:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.