Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChaosGallantmon Crimson Mode (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was MERGE to ChaosGallantmon. -Splash^talk 00:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ChaosGallantmon Crimson Mode

As stated this is the second nomination for this article. The previous discussion yielded no consensus; however, there was not a lot of discussion. I am hoping that we get a little bit more to determine what to do with this article. The article itself states that this is a toy and is apparently not endorsed as a real Digimon. There is nothing here that makes me believe that this is a "notable" toy. And this stub has remained un-edited for a very long time leading me to believe that there just may not be much more than this to add about this toy. James084 14:12, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. this is some of the "fat" that needs to be cut out. we have to draw a line for things that should be on wikipedia in regards to Digimon, and where ever that line is, I think this is outside of that line. It's not notable at all, this is information that serves no one.-- Ned Scott 03:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to ChaosGallantmon. Circeus 13:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRUFT. "It is not classified as a real Digimon." Stifle 22:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to ChaosGallantmon. He's not a "real" Digimon in the normal sense that purists -- including myself -- go by, as he doesn't exist in Japan, but he is most certainly a "real" Digimon in America, and there's no reason why the toy/Digimon shouldn't be mentioned, but I agree it doesn't merit an entry of its own. Shining Celebi 23:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Shining Celebi. Shiroi Hane 04:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge what little there is here to ChaosGallantmon. It doesn't matter if this is a canon Digimon, but if it's just a toy (and thus little can be said about it other than the fact that it exists), it should be merged into an appropriate article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.